1. The sectional name Cosmeoexonema Largent & Thiers (1972) has priority over the sectional name Papillata Romagnesi 1974. This has been corrected in Noordeloos, 1981: 141. As a consequence the following new combination is necessary: Entoloma subsection Papillata (Romagn.) Noordeloos comb. nov.—Basionym: Rhodophyllus section Papillati Romagn. in Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 43: 330. 1974. 2. Subsection Endochromonema has been published by me (Noordeloos, 1980: 495) without a Latin diagnosis; no type has been indicated. This is corrected below: Entoloma subsection Endochromonema Noordeloos, subsect. nov. Pigmentae pallidae, intracellulosae vel membranares, haud incrustantes; sporae heterodiametricae vel isodiametricae, haud multiangulatae nodulosae; pileus griseo-brunneus vel ochraceo-fulvus, nunquam atrobrunneus; stipes fibrillosus, saepe striatus, haud citrinus vel flavovirens; odore nullo vel farinaceo, nunquam aromatico.—Typus: Entoloma cetratum (Fr.) Moser. 3. Some spelling-corrections: Read Entoloma cuspidiferum in stead of E. cuspidifer and E. globuliferum in stead of E. globulifer. 4. In my key to the sections and subsections (Noordeloos, 1980: 431-432) the couplets 6 and 11 have to be changed in the following way: 6a. Cheilocystidia tibiiform, sphaeropedunculate or cylindrical to clavate, sometimes subcapitate, spores with dihedral base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subsect. Cosmeoexonema, p. 472 11b. Carpophores moderately to strongly pigmented; lamellae always with distinct grey or brown tinge 11´ 11´a. Spores with dihedral base . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subsect. Cosmeoexonema, p. 472 11´b. Spores with basal facet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subsect. Papillata, p. 553